Problems and solutions.
Network Marketing excellence.
Around two-and-a-half years since I initially drafted the marketing work-up for Fogg's 'Transforming MLM' book (and almost two years since I withdrew from the project), I find myself revisiting the whole subject of 'In search & praise of Network Marketing excellence'.
Sidebar: for those readers to whom the title is unfamiliar, it was to be a no-holds-barred critique-toward-solution of the problems this business faces. However, amid 'we don't want to write or read about this' reaction from prospective contributors and readers, John wisely switched it to a far more saleable 'what's good about the business' tome.
Back to the key issue… prominent in my pre-release wordery for the book was the phrase 'We want this to be a cool place where cool people come…' and that's the basis for the work-in-progress.
The start-point is simple:
- Mlm isn't anywhere near as good as 'mlmism' proclaims.
- Many mlm-ers, through ignorance or blind patriotism, either don't see and/or won't accept this—and when faced with objective critique, attack it as 'jealous negativity'.
- Cawing about 'just how great it all is' and blind-eyeing the problems reduce the credibility of the business among more balanced thinkers who aren't so-minded—read: 'nearly everybody else'.
- It may well be 'the greatest form of free enterprise etcetera'—although on the to-date track it clearly isn't.
- To address that problem and genuinely achieve the potential within its stated claim of 'enabling ordinary people to earn extraordinary income etcetera' requires change toward a business that can objectively be considered successful.
- It'll require and entail a lot more honesty, and less people—who'll be better trained in business principle & practice. All things considered, it'll need to operate more akin to normal businesses, doing stuff 'they've' been doing for years.
That'll remove a lot of the profits some gurus/heavy hitters make through exploiting the less-intelligent—hence the resistance toward such change in some quarters.
Not on some mission-of-mercy enlightenment gig, I'm in NM to make money—which I choose to do through operating honorably and ethically. I support John Mann's guide of 'every action from a NM-er should create a better impression of the business'—and that's why I speak out against stuff which clearly isn't, and encourage folk to be wiser.
On suggestions of 'Oh that'll never sell'? Right. And what if the objective wasn't to coin-it, and instead 'simply' to raise-the-bar by helping people become better informed?
Albeit cliched, 'a serious business, for serious people' is where we're headed with this.
Game on!
Filed by g on July 7 2008


